A survivor-authored archive of systemic rejection patterns. Documenting what they said. Decoding what they meant.
These tools make invisible systems visible — from tracing conflicts of interest to mapping patterns of denial and creating stronger reporting pathways.
Government rejections are often cloaked in generic language, vague justifications, and decision-maker discretion. This ledger preserves these phrases and translates their real-world impact through survivor-led interpretation. It is not a complaints page — it is a tool for ethical documentation, institutional memory, and pattern recognition.
Governed by the McLoughlin Charter.
| ID | Date | Official Phrase Used | Glossary Translation | Decision Source | Region | SSA Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading entries... | ||||||
You can submit anonymously or with attribution. All submissions are reviewed for glossary tagging. [Submit a Denial Phrase]
If you're feeling unsure or anxious, you're not alone. You can take your time, come back later, or ask someone you trust to help. Submitting even one phrase makes a difference.
Explore our latest articles and insights on advocacy, policy influence, and systemic accountability.
A step-by-step guide to registering your charity, from choosing the right structure to meeting ACNC requirements and setting up governance.
In the ecosystem of Australian not-for-profits, the label Public Benevolent Institution (PBI) carries both meaning and opportunity. For advocates, service providers, funders and policy-makers alike, understanding what a PBI is—and why the classification matters—can clarify a range of issues: purpose, compliance, tax status, public trust, and strategy.