Sick of long waiting lists for advocacy? Get help now.

Get Started Now Get Started Now

Critical Neurodivergent Studies

A structural, epistemic, and systems-level approach to understanding neurodivergence beyond pathology models.

“Neurodivergence is not a deficit within an individual — it is a pattern of meaning that becomes distorted or erased inside unjust systems.”

Academic Foundation

Critical Neurodivergent Studies draws from disability justice, systems theory, epistemic integrity, and lived experience frameworks to interpret how social, cultural, and institutional structures shape neurodivergent meaning.

Critical Neurodivergent Studies

This theory challenges deficit-based interpretations of neurodivergence, positioning cognitive variation as a legitimate epistemic stance rather than a medicalised anomaly. It provides analytical tools for understanding how institutions distort, erase, or appropriate neurodivergent meaning.

Theory Details

Author:
Sarah Ailish McLoughlin
Publisher:
The Index Line
Provider:
Strategic Advocacy Australia
Wikidata:
Q137324395

Contributing Organisations

🏛️

The Australian Advocacy Institute

Advancing structural approaches to disability justice and systemic access.

Visit Website →
🧠

EduPsyched

Inclusion Consultant

Specialists in inclusive design and neurodivergent accessibility frameworks.

Learn More →

EduLinked

Digital Accessibility Advisor

Ensuring digital equity for neurodivergent and disabled users across platforms.

Explore Services →

How Critical Neurodivergent Studies Shapes This Guide

This theory explains how systems interpret, distort, or suppress neurodivergent knowledge — and why structural change, not individual adaptation, is essential for justice.

🧩

Interpretation Systems

Reveals how institutions “read” neurodivergent behaviour and meaning — often through deficit-framed or non-neutral interpretive lenses.

🔎

Epistemic Integrity

Demonstrates why neurodivergent ways of knowing require protection from erasure, misinterpretation, and semantic distortion within systems.

⚖️

Systems-Level Harm Analysis

Highlights how harm accumulates not from individual traits but from structural forces such as policy design, cultural norms, and interpretive bias.

💬

Accessible Meaning-Making

Frames neurodivergent expression as a legitimate linguistic and epistemic system — not a deviation from a “normal” standard.

Critical Neurodivergent Studies reframes neurodivergence as a structural, relational, and epistemic pattern — not a medical problem to fix. By analysing systems of interpretation, semantic distortion, and institutional harm, this work provides a foundation for accessible design, justice-centred policymaking, and the protection of lived experience as legitimate knowledge.

Provider & Partners

Published by:
The Index Line
Inclusion Consultant:
EduPsyched
Digital Accessibility Advisor:
EduLinked

Critical Neurodivergent Studies is an original theoretical contribution licensed for educational and advocacy purposes through The Index Line and Strategic Advocacy Australia.